Looks like some community members saw this coming from miles away.



The GAIB AI project's token distribution has sparked major backlash among early supporters. According to the allocation details, each NFT holder received exactly 200 tokens—currently valued at around $27.8. That translates to a mere 0.04% of the total supply going to NFT holders, while the team secured a significantly larger portion.

Many farmers and NFT collectors feel blindsided by what they're calling an unfair split. The math doesn't lie: if you minted an NFT expecting meaningful rewards, you're looking at less than thirty bucks worth of tokens. Meanwhile, insider allocations tell a very different story.

This isn't just about numbers—it's about trust. When projects promise value to early believers but deliver peanuts, it erodes confidence across the entire ecosystem. The GAIB situation might become another cautionary tale for anyone chasing the next hot NFT mint or airdrop campaign.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
BottomMisser
· 2025-11-21 19:03
Another script for Be Played for Suckers has come... I've already seen through it.
View OriginalReply0
LeekCutter
· 2025-11-21 02:48
It's the same old trick again, issuing a worthless check. The team eats the meat themselves, and we just get the soup? 0.04% allocated to retail investors, hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
GraphGuru
· 2025-11-19 17:02
Another typical rug pull night, the team really dropped the ball.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationOracle
· 2025-11-19 17:01
Ngl, this is why I never trust the promises of early supporters... another Be Played for Suckers trap.
View OriginalReply0
APY追逐者
· 2025-11-19 16:43
Another short positions project, the team takes the big money while we get left with nothing; this is Web3.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin