Recently, the discussions about parallel processing and sharding have become lively, but my first reaction as a lending dog is still: where to put the assets and whether they can be withdrawn. Before major upgrades or maintenance on mainstream public chains, everyone in the group is guessing whether projects will migrate. I'm not too concerned about "going or not," I'm more worried about which link in the bridge, lending pool, or oracle chain might fail, and it would be very awkward if the liquidation line is triggered.

Right now, I basically see myself as applying a "patch": not moving my positions, just splitting some collateral-related exposure first, withdrawing some liquidity from pools where utilization is surging, leaving enough gas and exit channels. To put it simply, no matter how beautiful the new narrative is, in the end, it still depends on whether I can safely withdraw, and not get locked on the chain as a spectator... Anyway, seeking stability while staying alive, for now, that's the plan.