Kevin's article lacks the traces of "branding"; it resembles his personal summary of industry rules over the past two decades. Some judgments even seem a bit "slow"—but this slowness is, in fact, credible.

Many platforms are now implementing a "management speech mechanism", but most of the content resembles the work of content operation teams. In contrast, this piece in the square is a genuine, structured, and bounded expression: it clearly does not cater to short-term traffic, nor does it create bullish/bearish rhetoric, but rather writes about those things that "remain unchanged at the bottom yet are often forgotten in logic."

This type of content is not suitable for trending topics, but it can serve as a reference for readers' own judgments. The current plaza is still in its early stages, and there isn't much systematic content available. Following accounts of this kind is a choice of "minimum reading cost for early layout." Whether it will continue to be updated remains to be seen, but the tone set by the first piece is credible.
#Gate #Gate 大门