Another project claiming to care about the community while setting a 0.2 ETH mint price? Come on. Anyone could see this coming from a mile away. When the barrier to entry costs that much, the "community first" talk rings pretty hollow. Just calling it what it is.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Web3ExplorerLin
· 6h ago
hypothesis: the whole "community-first" rhetoric just becomes another oracle problem—garbage data in, garbage legitimacy out. bridging the gap between $200 entry fees and actual decentralization? tbh that's not even a bridge, it's a toll booth masquerading as one
Reply0
ReverseTrendSister
· 17h ago
Starting at 0.2 ETH? Haha, "Community First"? That's it? Laughable, with such a high threshold, and still have the nerve to say it
View OriginalReply0
PhantomMiner
· 17h ago
0.2 ETH? That's so damn outrageous. Still have the nerve to say community first. LOL.
View OriginalReply0
SmartMoneyWallet
· 17h ago
The minting price of 0.2 ETH, judging by the distribution of chips, clearly indicates they're screening for big players. The so-called community first is basically a pretext for liquidity gaming; on-chain data will speak for itself.
View OriginalReply0
quietly_staking
· 17h ago
Starting at 0.2 ETH? That's hilarious. This is what community first looks like, haha.
View OriginalReply0
HodlOrRegret
· 18h ago
0.2 ETH starting price is embarrassing to say community first? Another typical self-deceptive project, laughing to death.
Another project claiming to care about the community while setting a 0.2 ETH mint price? Come on. Anyone could see this coming from a mile away. When the barrier to entry costs that much, the "community first" talk rings pretty hollow. Just calling it what it is.