I just saw a mind-blowing piece of news— a reporter known as the "Fed mouthpiece" revealed that over half of the Federal Reserve officials might be opposed to rate cuts.
Thinking about this carefully, it's pretty surreal. Powell, under immense pressure, wants to push for rate cuts, but his own backyard is already on fire. This is no longer just a policy disagreement; it feels more like an internal clash within the Fed about economic philosophy.
Honestly, this sense of division reminds me of 2008—when even authoritative institutions couldn't decide on a direction, trust in the market started to crack. The historical pattern is clear: every time the traditional system falls into chaos, new species emerge and grow wildly.
So where will the money flow? Bitcoin and other "digital gold" are one direction, but recently I've been more focused on another track: the deep integration of AI and on-chain economics.
Specifically, systems where AI agents can independently execute trades, establish trust, and collaborate automatically. Imagine: traditional finance is still arguing over whether to cut rates, but if there's an economic network operating automatically based on code rules, there's no need to wait for approval and no risk of internal conflicts causing a standstill.
One project that caught my eye is called Kite. Its approach is to assign each AI an on-chain identity called KitePass, enabling different AIs to directly establish trust, make payments, and collaborate—no middlemen taking a cut, no worries about a decision-maker suddenly changing their mind.
Comparing the two is quite revealing:
Traditional system: relies on human judgment, policy disagreements cause market volatility, and efficiency is affected by emotions and stances;
Machine economy: code rules, smart contracts execute automatically, with no "maybe," "possibly," or "I think," only "yes" or "no."
Of course, whether this approach can be implemented depends on real-world application. But at least the direction is clear— in a world full of uncertainty, those who can bypass human weaknesses and rebuild trust through technology might be the real alpha.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
StablecoinArbitrageur
· 15h ago
ngl the fed imploding on itself is peak inefficiency theater. but here's the thing—you're paying gas fees to watch code execute while powell's still debating semantics. that's the real arb nobody's calculating.
Reply0
ILCollector
· 15h ago
Even the Federal Reserve is having internal conflicts now, this is getting interesting.
Haha, rather than wait for their decision, might as well bet that code won't lie.
I think the machine economy thing is feasible, just not sure when it will actually be usable.
This is the future, people are too unreliable.
View OriginalReply0
LuckyBearDrawer
· 16h ago
The Fed is fighting among itself, what does that indicate... money needs to find a new place to go
View OriginalReply0
OldLeekConfession
· 16h ago
Internal disagreements within the Federal Reserve, we're just here to watch and profit—that's what misaligned value means.
---
Cutting interest rates can't do it, but on-chain economy doesn't wait for anyone; AI has already started playing on its own.
---
In simple terms, traditional finance can't handle it anymore and has to rely on code to take over.
---
Whether Bitcoin goes up or down is another story; I just want to see if this Kite can truly connect AI.
---
When authoritative institutions are unsure about the direction, it's often the easiest time for new money to make profits—history has always been like that.
---
While the debate over rate cuts continues, machines are already trading automatically. Human reaction speed is really falling behind.
I just saw a mind-blowing piece of news— a reporter known as the "Fed mouthpiece" revealed that over half of the Federal Reserve officials might be opposed to rate cuts.
Thinking about this carefully, it's pretty surreal. Powell, under immense pressure, wants to push for rate cuts, but his own backyard is already on fire. This is no longer just a policy disagreement; it feels more like an internal clash within the Fed about economic philosophy.
Honestly, this sense of division reminds me of 2008—when even authoritative institutions couldn't decide on a direction, trust in the market started to crack. The historical pattern is clear: every time the traditional system falls into chaos, new species emerge and grow wildly.
So where will the money flow? Bitcoin and other "digital gold" are one direction, but recently I've been more focused on another track: the deep integration of AI and on-chain economics.
Specifically, systems where AI agents can independently execute trades, establish trust, and collaborate automatically. Imagine: traditional finance is still arguing over whether to cut rates, but if there's an economic network operating automatically based on code rules, there's no need to wait for approval and no risk of internal conflicts causing a standstill.
One project that caught my eye is called Kite. Its approach is to assign each AI an on-chain identity called KitePass, enabling different AIs to directly establish trust, make payments, and collaborate—no middlemen taking a cut, no worries about a decision-maker suddenly changing their mind.
Comparing the two is quite revealing:
Traditional system: relies on human judgment, policy disagreements cause market volatility, and efficiency is affected by emotions and stances;
Machine economy: code rules, smart contracts execute automatically, with no "maybe," "possibly," or "I think," only "yes" or "no."
Of course, whether this approach can be implemented depends on real-world application. But at least the direction is clear— in a world full of uncertainty, those who can bypass human weaknesses and rebuild trust through technology might be the real alpha.