Recently checked out this platform's revenue model and honestly? Pretty refreshing setup. The fee structure is intentionally lean—they're not bleeding projects dry during fundraising rounds.
Here's what caught my attention: when projects raise capital through their system, the platform clips a minimal percentage. Nothing predatory. Their token compensation model follows a gradual unlock schedule, which shows they're thinking long-term alignment rather than quick cash grabs.
The TVS mechanism is particularly clever—split and merge operations keep things flexible without adding hidden costs. It's rare to see platforms prioritize sustainability over extraction these days.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NoodlesOrTokens
· 12-13 05:52
Platforms with such restrained fee structures are indeed rare; most are just hungry wolves.
View OriginalReply0
FomoAnxiety
· 12-13 03:23
ngl, this fee structure is actually quite considerate; most platforms on the market use blood-sucking fee models... Who exactly created this platform?
View OriginalReply0
TopBuyerForever
· 12-10 22:58
ngl, this fee structure design is quite interesting. finally seeing a platform that isn't just trying to scalp users... just worried they might secretly introduce taxes later
View OriginalReply0
PerennialLeek
· 12-10 22:58
NGL, this fee structure isn't that outrageous after all. Finally seeing a platform that doesn't rely on exploiting newbies to survive.
View OriginalReply0
Ser_APY_2000
· 12-10 22:52
Bro, I've never seen such a considerate fee structure before. Finally, there's a platform that doesn't want to desperately exploit users.
View OriginalReply0
DoomCanister
· 12-10 22:50
ngl this fee structure is indeed rare. Most platforms are eager to drain the project team's resources, but this one is actually considering a long-term ecosystem? That's interesting.
View OriginalReply0
ForkItAllDay
· 12-10 22:48
ngl this is what a conscience platform looks like, the fee structure is not at all exploitative. Compared to those vampire-like project teams, it's completely worlds apart.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-00be86fc
· 12-10 22:44
ngl, this fee structure really isn't lying, it's rare.
Recently checked out this platform's revenue model and honestly? Pretty refreshing setup. The fee structure is intentionally lean—they're not bleeding projects dry during fundraising rounds.
Here's what caught my attention: when projects raise capital through their system, the platform clips a minimal percentage. Nothing predatory. Their token compensation model follows a gradual unlock schedule, which shows they're thinking long-term alignment rather than quick cash grabs.
The TVS mechanism is particularly clever—split and merge operations keep things flexible without adding hidden costs. It's rare to see platforms prioritize sustainability over extraction these days.