What is Tether brewing? Exploring new ways of liquidity management, previously restricted shareholder sales

Question

【CryptoWorld】Tether is making new moves behind the scenes. According to foreign media reports, this stablecoin giant is studying how to better ensure investor liquidity. Interestingly, they have previously intervened to prevent some existing shareholders from reducing their holdings.

What does this reflect? From the perspective of the stablecoin ecosystem, Tether, as the issuer of USDT, holds the confidence foundation of the entire ecosystem. The natural tension between investors’ liquidity needs and the stability of shares is inherent. On one hand, they want to provide investors with ample liquidity assurance; on the other hand, they need to prevent sudden sell-offs by major shareholders from disrupting corporate governance.

This initiative seems more like an attempt to find a balance between the two—by proactively managing liquidity, they aim to meet investor demands while maintaining strategic stability for the company. In a time when the entire Web3 market demands higher trust in stablecoins, this refined management approach is worth paying attention to.

SocialAnxietyStaker · Accepted Answer

Ha... Tether is causing trouble again? Feels like playing with fire.

Preventing shareholders from reducing holdings and also controlling liquidity? Isn't that trying to have it both ways?

The foundation of confidence? Nice words, but aren't they just afraid of a run?

Finding that balance point, but why does it feel so tangled?

Honestly, who dares to believe that stablecoins are truly stable...

Something's off, this routine feels a bit familiar.

PositionPhobia · Answer

This is playing with fire, trying to prevent selling off? Sounds very dangerous.

Tether's recent actions are indeed a bit of a double-edged sword. On one hand, they claim to ensure liquidity, but on the other hand, they restrict large holders from selling. Isn't this just trying to hold onto the chips?

It's already 2024, and they're still doing this. Trustworthiness is probably declining instead.

To put it simply, they just want to stabilize the market, fearing that retail investors will run away once they find out the truth.

Is managing liquidity like this really reliable? It feels like drinking poison to quench thirst.

It somewhat resembles a Ponzi scheme—the more they try to control, the bigger the problem seems.

BitcoinDaddy · Answer

This is a typical case of wanting both, can investor liquidity and shareholder stability truly coexist?

---

Tether's move really has a bit of the feeling of the fox and the wolf, haha.

---

Restricting shareholder share reduction? It kind of feels like you're adding weight to yourself...

---

What sounds nice is liquidity management; in reality, it's just holding onto the shares tightly without letting go.

---

Trust in stablecoins has always been fragile; their messing around makes a crash more likely.

---

So, whose liquidity is actually being protected?

StopLossMaster · Answer

Uh... What tricks is Tether up to now?

Trying to prevent shareholders from reducing holdings and also controlling liquidity—aren't they just trying to have it all?

If USDT really encounters problems, who can handle it?

token_therapist · Answer

They're starting to play mind games again, blocking shareholders from selling... Honestly, they're just afraid of crashing the market.

I've seen through Tether's tactics; liquidity management is basically market manipulation.

The most trusted moment for stablecoins, yet they restrict shareholders from cashing out? That's a bit ironic.

The crypto world is always like this—talking about liquidity on the surface, but actually controlling the big players.

So whether USDT is truly stable or not, you can tell by watching Tether's moves.

MysteriousZhang · Answer

Playing word games again, restricting shareholders from selling and still calling it "liquidity guarantee"?

Tether's move, to put it nicely, is about balancing; to be blunt, it's probably about preventing people from entering and exiting.

Can this trust base really be maintained through "liquidity management"? I'm a bit skeptical.

It's just a matter of controlling everything, after all, it's all decided by themselves.

The stablecoin ecosystem now relies entirely on USDT; if this continues, a crisis is inevitable.

It sounds impressive, but it's really just about market manipulation.

The Web3 market is becoming more regulated. How long can Tether's old tricks last?

This is the crypto world: in name one thing, in practice another.