Nasdaq IPO New Regulations Upgraded: SEC Grants Stricter Approval Authority, Small-scale Financing Projects Face Higher Thresholds

robot
Abstract generation in progress

【BlockBeats】 Recently, the IPO approval authority of the Nasdaq exchange has been upgraded again. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has newly approved a set of rules that give Nasdaq greater discretion in approving listing applications — allowing it to directly reject projects with manipulation risks.

Specifically, the new regulation permits Nasdaq to say no in these cases: the company’s business location does not cooperate with U.S. regulatory investigations; involved underwriters, brokers, lawyers, or audit firms have problematic trading records; concerns over the integrity of management or major shareholders.

Why is it so strict? The data speaks for itself. In the past year, half of the IPOs listed on Nasdaq raised no more than $15 million. That doesn’t sound like much. The problem is that these small-scale IPOs generally perform poorly after listing — the vast majority see their stock prices drop more than 35% within a year. One failure after another, regulatory authorities have decided it’s time to act.

This set of new rules is actually about plugging loopholes. Small financing projects, due to insufficient review and incomplete information disclosure, have become a hotspot for market chaos. Now Nasdaq has been empowered with more authority to filter these out, effectively adding a more efficient screening layer to the market. This is good news for investors; for those with less solid financing, going public will become more difficult.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FloorPriceNightmarevip
· 5h ago
Here come the new rules for cutting leeks again, anyway small projects are just doomed. Small IPOs drop 35% in a year. Just looking at this data makes it hard to watch, no wonder the SEC can't sit still. The move by Nasdaq was actually long overdue, to prevent a bunch of shit teams from raising money and fleeing. Integrity review is good, but I don't know how they define it; it feels more like surface-level articles. Real risky projects can't be stopped by these rules. Big capital can still find ways to go public. Raising only 15 million in half a round and still wanting to go public? Laughable, what do they even do at this level?
View OriginalReply0
WhaleWatchervip
· 12-14 12:50
Half bankrupt, three years to zero—this is the true picture of small-scale IPOs.
View OriginalReply0
FortuneTeller42vip
· 12-12 17:35
Here comes the return of the retail investors. Small-cap IPOs are dying so badly, yet they still want to go public. Serves them right for being scrutinized.
View OriginalReply0
SchrödingersNodevip
· 12-12 17:27
Here comes the bottleneck again, it’s even harder for small projects now.
View OriginalReply0
ClassicDumpstervip
· 12-12 17:25
Another new trick to cut leeks, this time directly blocking small projects at the source US regulators are really tough, outright banning trash from going public to prevent retail investors from being wiped out A 35% drop... That's why I advise people not to get involved with these small financing projects, no one is willing to take over Integrity review? It's here, it should have been like this long ago Is the SEC saving the market or saving people... hard to say
View OriginalReply0
ser_aped.ethvip
· 12-12 17:19
Small-cap listings are essentially a bloodbath for retail investors, and now it's finally going to be regulated --- Once again blocking financing for small projects, big institutions are overjoyed --- Those projects with a 35% drop should have been investigated long ago. Who the hell is coming in to take over? --- Nasdaq's move is ruthless, small financings are directly dead in the water --- It's called risk control in nice terms, but in harsh terms, it's just a game of monopoly rules --- 150 million in financing being suppressed, the market is becoming more competitive --- I support integrity reviews, but I'm afraid it will just become a disguised excuse to raise money --- Small IPOs are all dead? Why haven't those underwriters been arrested yet --- Regulations are becoming stricter, making it even harder for retail investors to take on the risk --- Compliance is a good thing, but it also shuts down opportunities for small projects
View OriginalReply0
MemeKingNFTvip
· 12-12 17:15
Here comes a new rule for cutting leeks again... Isn't this just sentencing small-cap projects directly to death?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)