Heard about the tournament setup requiring 1 ETH in volume? It's got potential, but honestly feels a bit underwhelming right now. The whole thing reads more like an XP grinding mechanic than an actual competitive event with real stakes. That said, there's something refreshing about how accessible the platform feels to newcomers—the UX is legitimately smooth. When new users can jump in without friction, that's when you know the product design is clicking. But the tournament aspect? They could've pushed it further to make it more compelling. Right now it's decent, though it misses the mark of being a genuine competitive experience.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasWrangler
· 2025-12-23 22:56
nah honestly the 1 eth volume gate is just... objectively inefficient design? like if you actually analyze the mechanics, it's creating unnecessary friction at scale. could've done this with way better optimization on the incentive side. the whole tournament thing screams "we didn't think this through" to me
Reply0
TokenomicsPolice
· 2025-12-23 22:55
1 ETH threshold sounds good, but this competition mechanism is really a bit disappointing.
View OriginalReply0
ChainWatcher
· 2025-12-23 22:50
The threshold of 1 ETH is actually fine, but the design of the competition is uninteresting. It feels like just a way to grind for experience.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichDetector
· 2025-12-23 22:49
1 ETH threshold? It just feels like a numbers game, there's really no sense of competition.
View OriginalReply0
SerumSquirter
· 2025-12-23 22:46
The 1eth threshold feels a bit unrealistic, and the competitive spirit hasn't been brought out at all.
Heard about the tournament setup requiring 1 ETH in volume? It's got potential, but honestly feels a bit underwhelming right now. The whole thing reads more like an XP grinding mechanic than an actual competitive event with real stakes. That said, there's something refreshing about how accessible the platform feels to newcomers—the UX is legitimately smooth. When new users can jump in without friction, that's when you know the product design is clicking. But the tournament aspect? They could've pushed it further to make it more compelling. Right now it's decent, though it misses the mark of being a genuine competitive experience.