Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Solana has always pushed the narrative that it’s “cheaper than Ethereum”, but lately it doesn’t feel that way.
I tried sending the same token from Jupiter mobile wallet and Phantom.
Both showed different gas fees. Naturally, I picked the cheaper one.
Still ended up paying the higher fee Jupiter showed.
That alone is confusing.
Then on Jupiter Ultra swap, it says “gasless”, yet every swap I made cost around $0.24. So what exactly is gasless here?
One thing I respect about Ethereum is this: it never takes more than the estimate. If anything, you pay less.
On Solana, the base fee might be cheap, but once you factor in priority fees, compute units, routing, and network congestion, the real cost shows up after the transaction. That’s the annoying part.
With the recent Ethereum updates, fees are clearer and more cheaper.
So is Solana cheap? On paper, yes.
In real life usage, not always.
This isn’t hate. It’s just pointing out a UX issue Solana really needs to fix.