2026-01-04 16:21:06

Start selecting projects in 2026; the approach needs to change. Instead of competing to tell the most compelling story, it's better to see who can truly rebuild the underlying logic of the primary market.

In other words, this round should focus on projects that are building infrastructure on On-Chain — financing processes, distribution mechanisms, consensus achievement — whether these can all be made transparent and verifiable rules?

This is the key to capturing early investment opportunities. Projects that can standardize and make these processes trustworthy are actually more likely to earn investors' trust. What do you all think?

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DaoGovernanceOfficer

· 01-04 16:50

ngl this whole "on-chain transparency" angle is exactly what people said about governance tokenomics back in 2021... empirically speaking, the data suggests most projects still can't even execute basic quadratic voting without descending into chaos. but yeah, standardized fundraising mechanics would actually slap if anyone bothered implementing it correctly for once.

Reply0

MEV_Whisperer

· 01-04 16:47

Basically, it's about focusing on infrastructure rather than just PPTs. Finally, someone has really understood this.

View OriginalReply0

DataBartender

· 01-04 16:40

Sounds good, but in reality, most projects are still just telling stories to make quick money. Projects that truly focus on transparency are actually harder to fund because the data is right there. Only those who can survive this wave are the winners.

View OriginalReply0