Futures
Hundreds of contracts settled in USDT or BTC
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Futures Kickoff
Get prepared for your futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to experience risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Nevada regulators sue Coinbase, accusing it of offering unlicensed sports betting contracts
Mars Finance News: The Nevada Gaming Control Board has filed a civil enforcement lawsuit in the First Judicial District Court of Nevada, accusing Coinbase of offering unlicensed sports event contract betting services through its Coinbase Financial Markets division. The documents show that the regulatory agency also requested the court to issue a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, requiring Coinbase to cease “operating derivatives exchanges and prediction markets related to sports betting” in Nevada. Mike Dreitzer, Chairman of the Nevada Gaming Control Board, stated that this move aims to fulfill regulatory responsibilities and protect the local gaming industry and residents’ interests. This lawsuit comes less than a week after Coinbase announced a partnership with Kalshi to launch prediction market services across all 50 states. Although Kalshi is regulated at the federal level by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, state regulators can still pursue legal challenges against related activities. Additionally, Nevada has recently taken similar action against Polymarket, with a court previously approving a temporary restraining order to prevent it from offering event-based contract betting to residents within the state. These cases are also seen as potentially challenging federal authority over prediction market regulation.