Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
The sky is falling‼️ Pop Mart's market value evaporated by 60 billion in one hour
After the earnings report was released, the stock price dropped more than 22.5% in just over an hour.
Revenue of 37.1 billion, net profit of 13 billion, all nearly tripled,
Such a performance sheet is impressive no matter where you place it.
Many people's first reaction: I don't understand.
Looking at Mixue Bingcheng:
Revenue of 33.5 billion, net profit of 5.9 billion,
Growth rate only over 30%, yet the stock price actually rose.
The issue isn't about "making money" or not,
but "how the money is made."
The problem with Pop Mart is that its growth structure is too single.
Almost all growth
is concentrated on one IP—Labubu.
This series sold 14.2 billion in a year,
with a growth rate of 365%, which sounds impressive.
But looking at other IPs,
hardly any can compete.
Out of 17 key IPs,
only one holds the ground,
even the once-main IPs
have clearly fallen behind.
This is equivalent to:
the company is betting its "future" on a single card.
And what the capital market fears most
is this kind of "single-point explosion."
Because the essence of the trendy toy industry is:
👉 Emotional consumption + content cycle
No matter how popular an IP is,
it has a lifecycle.
Being hot today
doesn't mean it will still be here in three years.
Once user aesthetic fatigue sets in,
income may directly plateau.
So what the market is looking at is not:
👉 how much is earned this year
but:
👉 whether it can still earn steadily in the future.
Looking at Mixue Bingcheng again, its growth logic is completely different:
It's not relying on a single blockbuster product,
but on a system—
👉 Store expansion
👉 Supply chain efficiency
👉 Channel penetration
This kind of growth:
can be replicated, can be anticipated.
To put it simply:
one relies on blockbuster hits to make a living,
the other relies on a system to make money.
Capitals are more willing to assign a higher premium to the latter for certainty.
This actually reflects a fundamental investment logic:
👉 The quality of growth is more important than the speed of growth.
If a company's growth
is supported by one product, one customer, one market,
then it is inherently fragile.
It may explode today,
but could fizzle out tomorrow.
But if growth comes from multiple engines,
even if each isn't particularly explosive,
the overall is more stable.
The same applies to individuals:
Don't put all your chips in one place.
Whether trading cryptocurrencies, investing, or doing business—
👉 Single-point explosion can make you quick money,
👉 Diversified structure is what allows you to survive longer.