View: Ethereum needs to establish a value capture mechanism, otherwise it will become an outdated security layer

PANews · 2025-03-18T06:19:05+00:00

The value of Ethereum is flowing to L2, but Rollups' profits do not bring real benefits to ETH stakers, resulting in unfairness. It is recommended that L2 should contribute fees to Ethereum, such as through ETH staking, transaction fees, MEV redistribution, etc. Ethereum needs to ensure its value, and L2 needs to pay for security to establish a sustainable ecosystem.

PANews

2025-03-18 06:19:05

Abstract generation in progress

Author: zak.eth, Co-founder of CORN

Translation: Felix, PANews

The value of Ethereum is leaking to L2. Rollups extract fees, MEV, and liquidity, while ETH stakers are left behind. If this continues, Ethereum will become a stupid security layer, and L2 will be printing money.

L2 does not need to use ETH as gas, but they do need to pay for the security of Ethereum. Currently, they almost do not have to pay any fees. This situation needs to change. Ethereum is not a free lunch. L2 should pay rent.

Base collected about $2.5 million in fees last month, while paying less than $11,000 to Ethereum. For every $1 Optimism pays to ETH, it earns about $321 from L2 fees. L2 profits are amazing, but ETH sees little to no value.

This is crazy.

Each rollup should contribute to Ethereum in one of the following ways:

ETH Staking Deposit: The L2 sorter should consider ETH as collateral for participation
Settlement fee: Some L2 costs should be attributed to Ethereum stakers
MEV reallocation: MEV generated by L2 should be routed back to Ethereum

If L2 does not use ETH as gas, it should still be required to stake ETH or deposit a portion of its token supply into the ETH treasury. The treasury will serve as the reserve for all rollup economies, making ETH the financial layer of the L2 ecosystem.

Ethereum validators should protect rollups, not just L1. L2 sequencers should be required to stake ETH and use re-staking to extend Ethereum’s security to all rollups. If L2 wants to gain trust from Ethereum, they need to pay for it.

Every L2 needs liquidity to transfer assets across chains. ETH should be the default settlement asset for all cross-rollup transactions. Native gas tokens are great, but ETH needs to be the liquidity layer.

L2 does not have to be forced to adopt a single pattern. They can use their own tokens, their own sequencers, and their own economics. But Ethereum needs to capture value, either through ETH staking, fees, or directly tied to the rollup economy.

Currently, Ethereum is subsidizing L2, while L2 is taking advantage of all the benefits. This is unsustainable. Either Ethereum must adjust forcibly now, or it may become an outdated security layer for rollup.

Related reading: Ethereum Foundation’s “Game of Thrones”, where is the Foundation’s major reform heading?

ETH-3,07%

CORN-2,36%

GAS-2,65%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.