#PI I have been rethinking the Pi project recently, and the more I think about it, the more I feel it is not a typical Blockchain. The project took 6 years to launch, but trump can list a coin and play people for suckers in a day. Everyone says it is slow, dragging, like air, and I am wondering if it is using a very subtle but systematic way to conduct an experiment on human Consensus.

The founder, Fan Chengdiao, is a Ph.D. in computer engineering from Stanford, not a Ph.D. in psychology, but his research direction is particularly closely related to human behavior and distributed systems. She is not like the kind of person who comes to cut a wave of money and leave, what she does is more like "how to use technology systems to guide a group of people to spontaneously form a global network." ”
Other chains start with technology, issue coins, and then build ecosystems. Pi does it the other way around, first gathering people, building trust, and accumulating identity data, allowing this network to start from "living people" instead of from capital.
Many people think that Pi has no value right now, but what it is doing is "screening" - those who can endure the slow pace, without anyone pushing the price, no exchanges, and constant negative news, are the ones who truly want to stay.
The Pi I currently have in hand looks like a coin, but it actually resembles a piece of land. In the future, will it be used for payments? For identity systems? Or will it be part of a global P2P credit network? No one can say for sure, but in my opinion, this direction has the potential to go further.
Everyone else wants to make money quickly, but this team is like planting a seed. The project team is not in a hurry, does not respond, and does not cater to it, but is waiting for a big variable of the times: global identity digitization, payment reconstruction, and the rise of on-chain credit.
I don't understand it right now, but I'm not planning to get off early; I'll take a few years and see.#BTC #ETH #ContentStar #HotTopicDiscussion