Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Qualcomm says UK lawsuit over smartphone chip royalties will be withdrawn
Qualcomm says UK lawsuit over smartphone chip royalties will be withdrawn
FILE PHOTO: Qualcomm shares slide as memory chip shortage hits smartphone market · Reuters
Reuters
Tue, February 17, 2026 at 8:47 PM GMT+9 1 min read
In this article:
QCOM
+1.61%
SSNLF
0.00%
AAPL
-2.27%
LONDON, Feb 17 (Reuters) - Qualcomm on Tuesday said a London lawsuit alleging it had abused its dominant position to force Apple and Samsung to pay inflated royalties will be withdrawn.
The British consumers’ association called Which? had brought the case on behalf of around 29 million people who bought iPhones or Samsung devices since 2015.
Which? had said consumers were entitled to up to 480 million pounds ($652.03 million) in compensation, with its arguing at a trial last year that Qualcomm made Apple and Samsung pay inflated royalties even if its chips are not used in a device under a worldwide so-called no licence, no chips policy.
Qualcomm, however, said the lawsuit mischaracterised its long-standing requirement for manufacturers to obtain a licence for its standard essential patents before buying chipsets.
Before the Competition Appeal Tribunal could rule following last year’s trial, Which? said in a statement that it would apply to withdraw the case having reached an agreement under which Qualcomm will make no payment to the claimant class.
Which? said that it had concluded Qualcomm’s practices “did not infringe competition laws, did not result in inflated royalties, and did not lead to an increase in prices consumers paid for their mobile phones”.
A Qualcomm spokesperson said: “This recognition by the class representative, following a trial on the merits, reaffirms what the courts in the United States have repeatedly held: Qualcomm’s licensing practices are lawful and do not harm competition.”
($1 = 0.7362 pounds)
(Reporting by Sam Tobin; editing by Catarina Demony)
Terms and Privacy Policy
Privacy Dashboard
More Info