🎉 Share Your 2025 Year-End Summary & Win $10,000 Sharing Rewards!
Reflect on your year with Gate and share your report on Square for a chance to win $10,000!
👇 How to Join:
1️⃣ Click to check your Year-End Summary: https://www.gate.com/competition/your-year-in-review-2025
2️⃣ After viewing, share it on social media or Gate Square using the "Share" button
3️⃣ Invite friends to like, comment, and share. More interactions, higher chances of winning!
🎁 Generous Prizes:
1️⃣ Daily Lucky Winner: 1 winner per day gets $30 GT, a branded hoodie, and a Gate × Red Bull tumbler
2️⃣ Lucky Share Draw: 10
WET's recent rally is indeed quite significant, but I have a question I want to discuss with everyone.
Imagine a scenario: On the Solana chain, there originally was 1 billion in daily trading volume on Raydium. Now, after the dark pool appears, this portion of transactions flows into the dark pool. On the surface, dark pools can indeed alleviate slippage issues, but upon closer thought, isn't this just a simple transfer of liquidity?
Essentially, the transactions are still the same—they've just moved from a public DEX to an opaque pool. The slippage problem is resolved, but what about the cost of liquidity fragmentation? The depth that was originally concentrated on Raydium has been diluted. Is this really an optimization for the entire ecosystem? Or is it just doing the same thing in a different place?