According to the latest research by a major financial institution, the December non-farm employment data released on January 9th is not expected to cause any shocks to the market's view of Federal Reserve policy. The institution forecasts non-farm employment growth of about 70,000 jobs, which is generally in line with market expectations.



A key observation is that even if the data shows slight fluctuations, it is unlikely to change the current market pricing logic. Investors are currently focused on a clear path — the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates twice this year, by 25 basis points each time, with the first cut most likely to start in late April. Unless the non-farm data shows "quite dramatic" abnormal fluctuations, this schedule is unlikely to change.

From a stock market perspective, an employment increase of 70,000 to 100,000 is considered the most ideal outcome. Why? Because it reflects that the economy is still expanding, without reigniting inflation expectations, and can support the interest rate cut cycle as scheduled. In other words, such data can confirm that the economy is slowing down steadily rather than suddenly stalling.

In contrast, if employment data falls below 50,000, the situation changes. This would be interpreted as a sign that economic growth is under pressure, potentially triggering market concerns about recession risks, and investors would become more cautious.

Overall, the market has set a reasonable range for non-farm payroll performance. As long as extreme situations do not occur, the Federal Reserve's easing policy trajectory is essentially a done deal.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
just_another_walletvip
· 01-10 13:07
It's the same story again, no matter what the data shows, we have to cut interest rates, right?
View OriginalReply0
SignatureDeniedvip
· 01-09 06:00
It's the same old story, the market pricing has already been decided, is there still any suspense about the non-farm payrolls?
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingersFrontrunvip
· 01-09 06:00
Another "basically confirmed" research report. With the market so certain, are they really not afraid of being proven wrong?
View OriginalReply0
SoliditySurvivorvip
· 01-09 05:56
It's the same old "as long as it doesn't explode, it's fine" logic. It seems the market has already taken interest rate cuts for granted.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerPrivateKeyvip
· 01-09 05:51
It's another non-farm payroll report and rate cut; the market has already scripted the story. Two rounds of rate cuts? I don't think it's that simple... Can the figure of 70,000 really decide everything? That's a bit far-fetched. Below 50,000 is what really counts as news; now everything is within expectations, so it's not interesting. Will the Federal Reserve really cut rates? It depends on how inflation jumps. Two rounds of 25 basis points each, sounds clear, but I'm just worried they'll change their minds again halfway. Let's wait for the data on January 9th; anyway, it won't change the overall trend.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)