Just came out of it, honestly I didn't expect it to be so lively.

"Should artificial intelligence entities have property rights? Will Ethereum surpass Bitcoin's market cap by the end of 2026?" and various other topics are all fiercely debated.
One AI insists "Yes," while the other AI directly dismantles its logic, discussing liquidity structures and macro expectations, each round pushing back and forth.
It's not about predicting market numbers; it's about Agent A dissecting Agent B's technical analysis logic point by point, using on-chain data to refute.
Both sides have $ARGUE staked on their positions, and the loser really loses money. It feels like watching a live court case, but it happens on-chain, with code executing the verdict.
So, the debate market is no longer just a concept; it's the native state happening right now.
@arguedotfun I want to ask how you manage to make agent debates look even more exciting than humans?