Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Futures Kickoff
Get prepared for your futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to experience risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Nurturing a bustling yet vibrant marketplace—the third way beyond cathedrals and casinos
Nurturing a lively yet vibrant marketplace—A third path beyond cathedrals and casinos Today, I went out and happened to read an article titled “Don’t Let Casinos Consume the Cathedrals.” Teacher Jocy wrote it very well. Among the articles I read in 2026, this one is the most practically meaningful. When I read the part mentioning “Many Chinese teams raised only five to seven million dollars around 2023… such runway just supports a little over two years. Now, either they have lost reputation in the crypto industry or they are leaving,” I felt a strong resonance inside. I don’t know much about other teams’ specific situations, but UniSat’s two funding rounds in 2024 were indeed roughly within this range. Whether in valuation or total funding, we have always kept a relatively conservative level. Compared to many Western projects with valuations in the billions and tens of millions of dollars in funding, there is almost no comparison. But our choice has always been clear: regardless of whether the market is cold or hot, we adhere to a frugal, “small steps, steady progress” low-power combat approach, focusing on high-quality, efficient delivery, and continuously improving team weaknesses through practice. From the very beginning, we never considered “withdrawing” as an option. As Teacher Jocy pointed out, the reason why the crypto industry across the ocean can continue to develop is largely due to generations of industry pioneers investing long-term, systematically, and in layers—that is a true “cathedral-style” construction path. In contrast, the reality around us often shows the opposite: talent is hard to retain, long-term vision is lacking, and the industry gradually degenerates into a game of stockpiling; short-term profit-seeking intensifies, ultimately forming an irreversible vicious cycle. These phenomena are not isolated cases but a true reflection of current industry structural issues. As the article states: “When Web3 is reduced to a big casino, when the mainstream narrative of the industry devolves from ‘changing the world’ to a pure wealth game, the best talents will vote with their feet.” Even the most optimistic builders have to admit: building a true “cathedral” has never been a one-day effort. But the problem is—if the cathedral is out of reach, do we have to accept the “casino” path? I don’t think so. Between these two, there is actually a long-overlooked third way. Between “relying on large-scale continuous investment” and “constantly withdrawing and fishing in dried-up ponds,” we can choose: to gradually build a low-power, lively, but thriving—marketplace—at a relatively low cost. Those who have read “The Cathedral and the Bazaar” might smile knowingly. Yes, as long as the path is right, building a vibrant, self-growing open-source marketplace does not necessarily require the high costs of constructing a magnificent cathedral. The development paths of open-source Linux, the evolution of open-source AI models like DeepSeek, and the open-source Bitcoin wallets and infrastructure like UniSat (please forgive me for mentioning it shamelessly) all follow similar logic in essence. Besides “spending money to build a cathedral,” we can also choose to rely on and promote further open-sourcing in the industry, allowing millions of independent developers to push their small carts and jointly foster a prosperous marketplace. Diversity is precisely the source of prosperity. A well-constructed open-source marketplace, driven by real needs and continuously refined and evolved through practice, may not be inferior in competitiveness and system robustness to the grand yet fragile centralized cathedrals. Furthermore, Vibe coding is significantly lowering the barriers for developers to customize and modify existing open-source code. In my view, the resurgence of open-source in the AI era is no longer just an idealistic declaration of “out of touch with the world,” but evolving into a true “code equality”—everyone has the opportunity to turn their real needs into runnable, usable code. And this is the best catalyst for nurturing a thriving marketplace. Small but continuous progress far surpasses ambitious but disastrous ventures. Let’s work together.