Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Beijing clarifies the criminal law positioning of AI training systems for the first time: the case of deleting model data is classified as the crime of damaging computer information systems.
According to Beating Monitoring, the Beijing Municipal People’s Procuratorate released the “Beijing Procuratorate Intellectual Property Rights White Paper (2025)”, which disclosed that in 2025, the city’s procuratorial organs handled 113 intellectual property cases related to artificial intelligence and data element industries.
The white paper highlights two first-of-its-kind cases in the AI field.
Dongcheng District Procuratorate handled Beijing’s first case of illegal deletion of AI model training data. An employee deliberately deleted a large amount of data used to train AI models, causing structural damage to the training system and significant economic losses. The procuratorial authorities prosecuted the case under the crime of disrupting computer information systems. The white paper states that this case helped recognize AI model training systems as “computer information systems” in the criminal law sense. This crime previously mainly targeted traditional information systems such as servers and databases being invaded or damaged; the criminal positioning of AI training data and training systems was not clear before.
Tongzhou District Procuratorate handled Beijing’s first case of copyright infringement using AI-generated models. Four defendants copied others’ works using AI technology without authorization for profit and were all convicted of copyright infringement.
In 2025, the Beijing procuratorial organs handled a total of 1,195 intellectual property cases, an increase of 10.34% year-on-year.