Modularization, to put it simply, doesn't bring much "qualitative change" for end users. You open your wallet, click confirm, pay the fee—it's still the same card. The more significant changes are behind the scenes: execution, data, consensus separated, making it easier for teams to assemble a chain, possibly speeding up the launch of new applications, and costs might become more stable—provided someone is actually using it, not just moving liquidity around.

I'm actually more concerned about: the more granular the separation, the blurrier the responsibility boundaries, and when problems occur, who's really to blame? Bridges, sequencers, data availability layers—if any link wobbles, users will just think "it's down again." The same goes for the collapse logic of chain games; modularization can't save inflation or studios. When token prices spiral, even the best architecture just accelerates the bursting of the bubble. First, see if there are any real new interactions on-chain; if there's no growth, don't get too excited.