AI Starts "Wool Shearing": Node.js Forced to Halt Bounty Due to Fake Vulnerability Reports


AI can write code, review code, and now it can also flood vulnerability reports.
On April 13th, HackerOne officially paused its 14-year-running "Internet Bug Bounty Program" (IBB), no longer accepting new vulnerability submissions.
The superficial reason is platform strategic adjustment; the real reason is only one: AI-generated fake vulnerability reports overwhelmed the maintainers.
HackerOne's official statement was: AI tools make vulnerability discovery far faster than fixing, flooding the platform with low-quality, false, and even forged reports, completely disrupting the open-source community's balance.
And the first to fall is Node.js.
The Node.js official then announced: due to the suspension of HackerOne's bounty program, the project will stop rewarding vulnerability reporters.
As a purely community-driven open-source project, Node.js has no independent budget to maintain a bounty pool. Once external funding stops, the bounties are directly zeroed out.
In fact, before HackerOne officially paused, Node.js had already been forced to make adjustments.
Security company Socket pointed out that Node.js had previously significantly raised the submission threshold, but it couldn't withstand the flood of AI tools—each report required volunteers to spend a lot of effort verifying, and nine out of ten reports were AI-generated.
Moreover, Node.js is not the first to fall.
In January this year, cURL founder Daniel Stenberg announced the termination of its bug bounty program for the same reason: within a week, the team received 7 AI-generated "pseudo-vulnerability reports" totaling 16 hours of work, which appeared linguistically rigorous and structurally complete, but after manual verification, they were all junk.
He called these kinds of reports "AI Slop"—seemingly reasonable but actually useless redundant garbage.
The absurdity of this situation is that the bug bounty mechanism was originally meant to incentivize high-quality security research with real money, but AI has lowered the threshold for submitting reports to zero—running through the codebase with AI, automatically generating dozens of seemingly legitimate reports, submitting blindly, and if just one hits the mark, it’s a win.
Maintainers are drowning in garbage reports, leaving no time to review genuine vulnerabilities. $ETH
{spot}(ETHUSDT)
ETH-3.17%
View Original
post-image
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin