This move by Arbitrum gave hackers a taste of "funds social death"

What is on-chain social death?
It means the money is in your wallet, but the whole world knows you can't spend it.
This time, hackers experienced it firsthand.
After KelpDAO was attacked, the funds just entered the Arbitrum ecosystem and were immediately identified and frozen, all in a clean and efficient process with no unnecessary steps.
This reveals a key point:
On-chain transparency is turning into a "defensive weapon."
In the past, transparency was an advantage for hackers—making it easy to trace fund flows.
Now, transparency becomes a disadvantage—everyone can watch you.
It's like stealing in a mall full of surveillance; theoretically, you can run, but you've already been marked.
More importantly, this marking is "shared across the entire network."
What does this mean?
Hackers are not just targeted by a single protocol but are "blacklisted" by the entire ecosystem.
In the long run, this will lead to a very interesting result:
Attack activities shift from "high profit" to "high risk and low reward."
And when the rewards no longer justify the risks, attacks naturally decrease.
So, the real significance of this incident isn't about "recovering how much ETH,"
but about making hackers realize— the on-chain world is becoming harder to manipulate.
In summary:
It used to be you hacking projects; now, projects are turning around to "hack" you. #The