Recently, people keep talking about how "modularization" is changing the world, and frankly, for end users' experience, there are really only two things: one is cheaper and faster, and the other is more fragmented and chaotic. Before, you only focused on one chain's wallet, Gas, and browser; now, it’s about which DA, which settlement layer, which execution layer—you don’t even want to understand. But when transactions get stuck, cross-layer transfers don’t arrive, or bridges have issues, it’s all on you to trace the path and take the blame.



From a product perspective, it expands the "failure points" from a single point to a chain: signing → routing → bridge → ordering → final confirmation… Any glitch in the middle makes the experience like a microservice integration in Web2. The AI Agent/auto-trading wave is even more obvious. Some praise it as "helping you interact with one click," but I just want to ask: what exactly did it sign for you, who has the permissions, and how is rollback calculated? Anyway, when I see "automation," I first look at authorization and revocation options… Forget it, I won’t talk more, or it’ll sound like I’m trying to discourage you.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin