Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently, people keep talking about how "modularization" is changing the world, and frankly, for end users' experience, there are really only two things: one is cheaper and faster, and the other is more fragmented and chaotic. Before, you only focused on one chain's wallet, Gas, and browser; now, it’s about which DA, which settlement layer, which execution layer—you don’t even want to understand. But when transactions get stuck, cross-layer transfers don’t arrive, or bridges have issues, it’s all on you to trace the path and take the blame.
From a product perspective, it expands the "failure points" from a single point to a chain: signing → routing → bridge → ordering → final confirmation… Any glitch in the middle makes the experience like a microservice integration in Web2. The AI Agent/auto-trading wave is even more obvious. Some praise it as "helping you interact with one click," but I just want to ask: what exactly did it sign for you, who has the permissions, and how is rollback calculated? Anyway, when I see "automation," I first look at authorization and revocation options… Forget it, I won’t talk more, or it’ll sound like I’m trying to discourage you.