Lately, when checking if the project is actually working, I’ve been more focused on how the treasury is spending. It’s not that spending money is wrong, but that kind of “milestones still on the PPT, expenses first fattening ourselves” just feels awkward… It’s both funny and frustrating. The normal pace should be: invest in auditing/monitoring/infrastructure when needed, keep progress on track, justify expenses with clear reasons, and don’t pretend to be dead when community questions arise.

And now, with the staking, shared security, and yield stacking being criticized as “copy-paste,” I can understand: if your treasury takes money to fund high-yield stories, it’s lively in the short term but shifts all the risks onto users in the long run. Honestly, I’d rather see them slow down, focus on solid security and delivery, instead of shouting “security sharing” while cutting security budgets to laughable levels. Anyway, for large amounts, I still stick to the old rules: if auditing and monitoring aren’t in place, no matter how smooth the bridge, I won’t use it. That’s how it is for now.