Recently, people have been talking about LSTs and re-staking again, and honestly, the returns don’t fall from the sky: one part is the basic yield from underlying staking, and the other part mainly relies on packaging "security" and selling it to other protocols. It sounds pretty good, but there are risks—being layered with multiple promises on the same underlying asset, any layer failing could cause a chain reaction, especially during unbonding or queuing periods, which are the most mentally stressful.



AI agents and automated trading are also quite similar: the narrative is hyped up, and as on-chain interactions increase, even a small loophole in contract permissions, signatures, or routing can ultimately be paid for by users. Anyway, I’m now more concerned about "what’s the worst that could happen," treating complexity as the enemy. If I can avoid stacking layers, I do. Keep it mechanical, sleep more peacefully.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin