Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Tried out GPT's image processing feature briefly.
Not sure if I opened it the wrong way?
Images 1234 are respectively the original image, GPT, Grok, and Gemini in the same keyword comparison group.
Based on the output results, I personally feel GPT is clearly more powerful, especially in depth-of-field processing.
The banana model is also quite good.
Grok's preview image is a bit rough, but it looks much better when opening the full image.
And GPT uses the completely free version, while Grok and are paid versions.
The keywords also come from GPT's "pre-made templates," which can help the model improve further with simple descriptions.
Prompt engineers might need to consider a new job role.