Recently, looking at DAO proposals feels a bit like watching succulent cuttings... The surface says "improve governance / increase efficiency," but I'm more concerned with the underlying layer: who can make proposals, who can change parameters, whether voting rights are tied to incentives. Frankly, many proposals are not about right or wrong, but about redistributing who has the authority to make decisions and at what cost. Especially those that pile rewards onto voting participation—what seems to encourage involvement may actually be pulling in people who don't want to care, just to boost presence, ultimately resulting in a few people using process to lock in outcomes. Anyway, I usually look at proposals based on three things: fund flow, permission boundaries, and exit mechanisms. If one is missing, I get uneasy. By the way, I also thought about the recent NFT royalty debate—creators want income, the market wants liquidity, but in the end, it all comes down to which rules favor whom and who has the switch. I’ll stop here.