Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 30+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
DeepMind researcher speculates that the delay of DeepSeekV4 is due to training data doubling to 33T causing severe instability
CryptoWorld News reports that DeepMind researcher Susan Zhang speculates that the delay of DeepSeek V4 was caused by severe instability triggered by doubling the training data to 33T. According to the V4 technical report, V4-Flash and V4-Pro were pre-trained on 32T and 33T tokens respectively, doubling from about 15T tokens in V3. The report admits that during training, significant instability challenges were encountered, with loss spikes repeatedly occurring, rooted in anomalous values in the MOE layers, and the routing mechanism itself exacerbating these anomalies, making simple rollback insufficient to fully resolve the issue. DeepSeek identified two solutions and has already applied them in actual training: anticipatory routing, which decouples routing index computation from backbone network updates and only triggers automatically when a loss spike is detected, with an additional overhead of about 20%; Swiglu clamping, which clips activation values to a fixed range to directly suppress anomalies. The report states that both methods are effective but acknowledges that the underlying principles are not yet fully understood.