Lately, looking at options, the more I see, the more I feel that time value is quite "biased": the buyer wakes up every day first being bitten by theta, even if the market doesn't move, they're losing money; the seller is like collecting rent, and the biggest fear is that one day a sudden spike of volatility will pierce through. To put it simply, time eats away at the buyer's patience and feeds the seller's luck.



Now everyone is comparing RWA, US bond yields, and various on-chain "returns," I just want to say don't just look at the annualized figures; the implicit costs in options are even more: spreads, slippage, hedging adjustment fees, which might be more brutal than the "time value" you think.

The noise reduction strategy is simple: first write all costs (fees + spreads + possible hedging adjustments) in one line, then decide whether to stand on the buyer's or seller's side, otherwise it's all noise.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin