These days, as I review DAO proposals, it increasingly feels like I'm looking at a neighborhood homeowners' association chat group: on the surface, it's "for a better ecosystem," but in reality, how each incentive is distributed, how voting rights are calculated, and who to delegate to, all clearly outline the power structure. To put it simply, some proposals aren't about solving problems; they're about patching the "patch" that determines who can access resources. Small fixes can restore the overall pattern. Recently, I also heard news about tax increases and tightening or loosening compliance in certain regions, which made everyone's expectations for deposits and withdrawals suddenly more sensitive. During voting, it's easier to be influenced by "short-term rewards." Anyway, before I click to vote now, I always check one sentence first: who ultimately benefits from the money and votes, or else it's easy to become just a background player.