I usually do a lot of diving, and today I saw someone on the blockchain again rushing to cross the chain bridge, so I couldn't help but chime in. To be honest, the risks of bridges are often not about "the chain breaking," but about the "people and information" layer: how many signers are actually making decisions, whether the keys are controlled by the same group of people; if the price/status fed by the oracle gets hacked, the bridge side is like a blind man with eyes closed. And the most annoying thing everyone complains about—"waiting for confirmation"—actually just gives you time to spot anomalies and reduces the chance of reorganization, not that the platform is deliberately testing your patience... Anyway, I now prefer to go slower and not rely on luck. As for the recent social mining and fan token schemes—"attention is mining"—I'm a bit tired of it. It's lively, but in the end, risk is what pays the bill. Forget it, I won't talk about it anymore, just keep diving.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin