In the past couple of days, the group has been churning out posts about stablecoin regulation, reserve audits, and all kinds of screenshots of “about to de-peg.” Once emotions start to run hot, it’s easy to treat those on-chain “coincidental transfers” as insider information. To put it plainly, I prefer to break the route down first: who withdraws from the exchange first, which common intermediary address it passes through, and finally whether it ends up in a market-making/lending pool or goes back to another exchange. A lot of addresses that look like they “suddenly got connected” are actually just the same underlying routing pattern: collection wallet → distribution → cross-chain/bridge → then collected again.



I usually look at the timestamps and the amount-splitting patterns more closely—especially those batch transfers that are overly neat; in most cases, it’s a script running, not necessarily someone suddenly “knowing something.” Of course, I can’t rule out that someone may have laid groundwork in advance, but at least I explain the parts that can be explained first, so my mindset stays steadier and I don’t get swept along by rumors.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin