Odaily Planet Daily reports that Hyperliquid co-founder Jeff posted on X to refute recent allegations against the ADL (Auto-Deleveraging) mechanism, stating that some commentators have drawn incorrect conclusions without understanding the core concepts. He emphasized that the ADL mechanism “does not transfer PnL to HLP,” and pointed out that its handling of users and HLP is completely symmetrical, adding that “ADL has nothing to do with HLP or back-to-back liquidation.” Jeff also denied claims that “ADL destroyed $653 million in profits,” saying that such statements are based on misunderstandings. He criticized certain self-proclaimed academically-backed authors for “using complex machine learning terms to package erroneous arguments,” and stressed that one should understand the subject before publishing research or commentary.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Hyperliquid co-founder Jeff responds to critics: ADL has nothing to do with HLP, denies claims of “destroying $653 million in profits”
Odaily Planet Daily reports that Hyperliquid co-founder Jeff posted on X to refute recent allegations against the ADL (Auto-Deleveraging) mechanism, stating that some commentators have drawn incorrect conclusions without understanding the core concepts. He emphasized that the ADL mechanism “does not transfer PnL to HLP,” and pointed out that its handling of users and HLP is completely symmetrical, adding that “ADL has nothing to do with HLP or back-to-back liquidation.” Jeff also denied claims that “ADL destroyed $653 million in profits,” saying that such statements are based on misunderstandings. He criticized certain self-proclaimed academically-backed authors for “using complex machine learning terms to package erroneous arguments,” and stressed that one should understand the subject before publishing research or commentary.