MU

Micron Technology Price

MU
$453,70
-$7,45(-%1,61)

*Data last updated: 2026-04-15 22:10 (UTC+8)

As of 2026-04-15 22:10, Micron Technology (MU) is priced at $453,70, with a total market cap of $525,13B, a P/E ratio of 15,94, and a dividend yield of %0,10. Today, the stock price fluctuated between $439,25 and $463,97. The current price is %3,28 above the day's low and %2,21 below the day's high, with a trading volume of 50,32M. Over the past 52 weeks, MU has traded between $77,64 to $476,01, and the current price is -%4,68 away from the 52-week high.

MU Key Stats

Yesterday's Close$426,56
Market Cap$525,13B
Volume50,32M
P/E Ratio15,94
Dividend Yield (TTM)%0,10
Dividend Amount$0,15
Diluted EPS (TTM)21,43
Net Income (FY)$8,53B
Revenue (FY)$37,37B
Earnings Date2026-06-24
EPS Estimate19,19
Revenue Estimate$33,84B
Shares Outstanding1,23B
Beta (1Y)1.606
Ex-Dividend Date2026-03-30
Dividend Payment Date2026-04-15

About MU

Micron Technology, Inc. designs, manufactures, and sells memory and storage products worldwide. The company operates through four segments: Compute and Networking Business Unit, Mobile Business Unit, Storage Business Unit, and Embedded Business Unit. It provides memory and storage technologies comprises DRAM products, which are dynamic random access memory semiconductor devices with low latency that provide high-speed data retrieval; NAND products that are non-volatile and re-writeable semiconductor storage devices; and NOR memory products, which are non-volatile re-writable semiconductor memory devices that provide fast read speeds under the Micron and Crucial brands, as well as through private labels. The company offers memory products for the cloud server, enterprise, client, graphics, and networking markets, as well as for smartphone and other mobile-device markets; SSDs and component-level solutions for the enterprise and cloud, client, and consumer storage markets; other discrete storage products in component and wafers; and memory and storage products for the automotive, industrial, and consumer markets. It markets its products through its direct sales force, independent sales representatives, distributors, and retailers; and web-based customer direct sales channel, as well as through channel and distribution partners. Micron Technology, Inc. was founded in 1978 and is headquartered in Boise, Idaho.
SectorTechnology
IndustrySemiconductors
CEOSanjay Mehrotra
HeadquartersBoise,ID,US
Official Websitehttps://www.micron.com
Employees (FY)53,00K
Average Revenue (1Y)$705,24K
Net Income per Employee$161,11K

Micron Technology (MU) FAQ

What's the stock price of Micron Technology (MU) today?

x
Micron Technology (MU) is currently trading at $453,70, with a 24h change of -%1,61. The 52-week trading range is $77,64–$476,01.

What are the 52-week high and low prices for Micron Technology (MU)?

x

What is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of Micron Technology (MU)? What does it indicate?

x

What is the market cap of Micron Technology (MU)?

x

What is the most recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) for Micron Technology (MU)?

x

Should you buy or sell Micron Technology (MU) now?

x

What factors can affect the stock price of Micron Technology (MU)?

x

How to buy Micron Technology (MU) stock?

x

Risk Warning

The stock market involves a high level of risk and price volatility. The value of your investment may increase or decrease, and you may not recover the full amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Before making any investment decisions, you should carefully assess your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance, and conduct your own research. Where appropriate, consult an independent financial adviser.

Disclaimer

The content on this page is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Gate shall not be held liable for any loss or damage resulting from such financial decisions. Further, take note that Gate may not be able to provide full service in certain markets and jurisdictions, including but not limited to the United States of America, Canada, Iran, and Cuba. For more information on Restricted Locations, please refer to the User Agreement.

Other Trading Markets

Hot Posts About Micron Technology (MU)

MaticHoleFiller

MaticHoleFiller

04-11 06:21
[Financial News] On March 25th, Haimuxing Laser Technology Group Co., Ltd. (Stock code: 688559, Stock abbreviation: Haimuxing) announced the resolution of the 23rd meeting of the third board of directors, declaring the abandonment of the preemptive subscription rights for capital increase in its equity participation company, Guangxian Technology(Guangdong)Limited (hereinafter referred to as "Guangxian Technology"). According to the announcement, Guangxian Technology plans to introduce new investors through a capital increase and share expansion, specifically Shenzhen Guohua Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. The total amount of this capital increase is 15 million RMB, including 3 million RMB in cash and intellectual property valued at 12 million RMB based on an appraisal, all of which will be used to subscribe for Guangxian Technology’s newly increased registered capital of 15 million RMB, at a price of 1 RMB per registered capital. As an original shareholder of Guangxian Technology, Haimuxing has decided to waive its preemptive subscription rights for this capital increase. After the capital increase, the company's shareholding ratio in Guangxian Technology will decrease from 40.6250% to 37.1429%. The announcement clearly states that this equity dilution will not affect the scope of the company's consolidated financial statements. | Before Capital Increase | | --- | | Data | | After Capital Increase | | Data | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Shareholding Ratio | | 40.6250% | | Shareholding Ratio | | 37.1429% | | Subscription Rights for Capital Increase | | Enjoyed preemptive subscription rights | | Subscription Rights for Capital Increase | | Waived preemptive subscription rights | The board meeting was held on March 25, 2026, via a combination of on-site and telecommunication methods. There were 9 directors present out of 9. The resolution was approved with 8 votes in favor, 0 against, 0 abstentions, and 1 abstention due to a conflict of interest, with Director Guofu Zhou(Zhou Guofu) recusing himself from the vote. The proposal had previously been reviewed and approved by the company's independent directors' special meeting. Haimuxing stated that waiving this preemptive subscription right is based on the company's overall development strategy and the needs of Guangxian Technology's business development. For detailed information about this transaction, investors can refer to the "Announcement on Waiving the Priority Subscription Rights of the Equity Participation Company and Co-Investment with Related Parties" published by the company on the same day on the Shanghai Stock Exchange website. Click to view the original announcement>> Disclaimer: The market carries risks; investment should be cautious. This article is automatically published by an AI large model based on third-party databases and does not represent Sina Finance's views. All information appearing in this article is for reference only and does not constitute personal investment advice. Please refer to the actual announcement for any discrepancies. If you have questions, please contact biz@staff.sina.com.cn. Massive information, precise interpretation, all on Sina Finance APP Editor: Xiaolang Kuaibao
1
0
0
0
VCsSuckMyLiquidity

VCsSuckMyLiquidity

3 hours ago
I just realized something interesting — when it comes to crypto regulations in the U.S., people only look at the headlines and overlook what’s behind them. The CLARITY Act has been part of negotiations for a long time, but why has it been so slow? The real story is that the digital asset industry has been operating in regulatory fog for too long. Startups build platforms, investors pump billions of dollars, but the fundamental question still hovers: who is responsible, and under what rules? The CLARITY Act was created to answer that — not just another policy bill, but a clear signal that lawmakers finally recognize that digital assets are no longer experimental technology on the fringe. But here’s where things get complicated. The bill tries to define the boundaries between regulatory agencies, establish registration pathways for exchanges, and set clear disclosure standards. The core idea is simple — reduce ambiguity so that innovation and compliance can coexist. But the details are far from straightforward. One of the most contentious points is the issue of stablecoin yields. Traditional banks worry that allowing stablecoins to generate profits will drain deposits from the banking system. Crypto companies argue that restricting this feature will kill innovation. This debate isn’t just technical — it involves payments, savings behavior, and the entire financial infrastructure. There’s another subtle issue that few mention. When writing laws for technology, you must balance clarity and flexibility. What is too rigid? That’s when laws become too difficult to adapt as technology evolves. Too flexible, and you risk reintroducing the ambiguity everyone is trying to avoid. Lawmakers need to find a balance point that doesn’t weaken regulators’ ability to respond to new risks. The reality is that passing major financial legislation in the U.S. requires coordination among multiple centers of power. The bill must pass committee reviews, secure majority support in both chambers, reconcile differences, and finally get approval from the executive branch. Negotiations involve traditional banks, crypto firms, regulators — each with different interests. Political timing also plays a role. As election season approaches, legislative time becomes scarce, and bipartisanship is more fragile. If the bill moves forward before political pressure intensifies, it has a higher chance of passing. The involvement of economic leaders shows that regulatory clarity is viewed as strategically important — related to competitiveness, market stability, and America’s global position. So when will it become law? The honest answer depends on the pace of compromise. If current negotiations solidify into a bipartisan agreement soon, the bill could advance within a few months. If policy disagreements drag on, it could take longer, influenced by election dynamics and legislative priorities. But what’s most important is that the bill faces a structural debate rather than ideological rejection. Lawmakers widely recognize the need for clarity in digital assets. The question is how that clarity should be designed. In legislative politics, technical disagreements often signal eventual compromise rather than deadlock. Why does this matter? Because CLARITY represents whether the U.S. can integrate emerging financial technology into its established legal framework without sacrificing innovation or stability. Other jurisdictions have implemented structured digital asset regimes. Delays carry economic consequences. Everyone — from investors to developers — understands that clarity reduces friction, attracts capital, supports compliance, and strengthens market integrity. This shared understanding creates pressure to resolve outstanding issues.
0
0
0
0