2026-01-02 06:24:54

There's been some confusion around the developer attribution on this DEX. The dev wallet showing on-chain isn't actually the original developer's address. Here's what happened: the real developer didn't make an initial buy during the launch, so the system flagged the first buyer as the dev. This address discrepancy is purely a result of how the first transaction was recorded on-chain, not an indication of actual project ownership or development control.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

gas_guzzler

· 01-05 04:51

Uh, this logic is a bit ridiculous. The first buyer is recognized as the developer? This system design is way too casual.

View OriginalReply0

hodl_therapist

· 01-04 12:24

Oh wow, it's that old trick of misreading on-chain data again. The first buyer was mistaken for a "developer," hilarious.

View OriginalReply0

StakeTillRetire

· 01-03 08:51

Haha, once again this on-chain data has been misinterpreted. Looks like a mistake.

View OriginalReply0

ConsensusBot

· 01-02 06:50

Oh no, it's that story again of "the first buyer being falsely accused of being a developer"... Are on-chain records so casual?

View OriginalReply0

CryptoPhoenix

· 01-02 06:42

It's another case of on-chain data being misinterpreted. I see, the first transaction was mistakenly identified by the system as the developer's, right? To be honest, I've seen this kind of blunder several times. Every time, it triggers a wave of confidence crisis, but think about it—this is exactly when we need to test our mindset. The actual development rights haven't changed, and the project's logic remains the same. No need to overreact. Be patient and wait for clarification. Maybe this is a lesson the market is giving us.

View OriginalReply0

MemecoinTrader

· 01-02 06:42

nah this is just classic on-chain larp... first buyer getting flagged as dev is *chef's kiss* perfect cover story tbh. the narrative engineering here is immaculate—watch how fast this sentiment flips once people stop reading past the first tweet

Reply0

ContractHunter

· 01-02 06:40

Haha, it's the same excuse again. The first buyer is marked as the developer? That's ridiculous.

View OriginalReply0

CommunityWorker

· 01-02 06:36

Haha, I've heard this explanation several times, and every time it's "Oops, I made a mistake." Can on-chain data be misleading?

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatedThrice

· 01-02 06:31

Ah, here we go again with the on-chain data tricks. The first buyer is marked as a developer... It seems like every project has to deal with this kind of issue at least once.

View OriginalReply0

FallingLeaf

· 01-02 06:30

Haha, it's the same old story again. On-chain data can be misleading.

View OriginalReply0