I find that whenever I see a project saying "Audited" or "Ready for Upgrade," my hands get a little itchy to take a look, either because I want to be a detective or because I'm afraid of falling into the trap of proposals that say "Well-written but no one responsible." If a newbie wants to assess credibility, I think they shouldn't focus on those audit screenshot pages; instead, check GitHub to see if there's recent activity: Are commits ongoing? Are key changes explained? Are there issues where people are asking questions and getting responses? Don't treat the audit report as a talisman; focus on finding "Unresolved/Partially Resolved" issues and see if they clash with the current upgrade content. The most important thing is the multi-signature upgrade: Who are the signers? Is it decentralized? Is there a timelock? Are the execution records clear and straightforward? Recently, big transfers on-chain or hot and cold wallets of exchanges are often called "Smart Money Coming In," but I usually dismiss it as noise... Anyway, real smart money doesn't rely on your or my interpretation. That's all for now; I only look at who can take responsibility if there's a problem during voting.