When I’ve been reviewing projects lately, I go with the “coffee three-piece set”: GitHub, audit reports, and multi-sig upgrades.
On GitHub, I don’t care how many lines you’ve written; mainly, I look at whether people are consistently doing real work, whether issues/PRs are being answered seriously, and whether fixes are quick when something goes wrong. As for the kind that’s lively for a week and then it’s all “next time for sure” afterward—I’m going to let that cool off first.
For audit reports, don’t just stare at the logo either. Flip through and check whether serious issues were truly
View Original