META

Meta Platforms Price

META
$613.00
+$3.30(+0.54%)

*Data last updated: 2026-05-05 10:03 (UTC+8)

As of 2026-05-05 10:03, Meta Platforms (META) is priced at $613.00, with a total market cap of $1.54T, a P/E ratio of 27.52, and a dividend yield of 0.34%. Today, the stock price fluctuated between $612.32 and $613.33. The current price is 0.11% above the day's low and 0.05% below the day's high, with a trading volume of 16.12M. Over the past 52 weeks, META has traded between $520.00 to $796.25, and the current price is -23.01% away from the 52-week high.

META Key Stats

Yesterday's Close$608.74
Market Cap$1.54T
Volume16.12M
P/E Ratio27.52
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.34%
Dividend Amount$0.52
Diluted EPS (TTM)27.85
Net Income (FY)$60.45B
Revenue (FY)$200.96B
Earnings Date2026-07-29
EPS Estimate7.19
Revenue Estimate$60.06B
Shares Outstanding2.54B
Beta (1Y)1.309
Ex-Dividend Date2026-03-16
Dividend Payment Date2026-03-26

About META

Meta Platforms, Inc. engages in the development of products that enable people to connect and share with friends and family through mobile devices, personal computers, virtual reality headsets, and wearables worldwide. It operates in two segments, Family of Apps and Reality Labs. The Family of Apps segment offers Facebook, which enables people to share, discuss, discover, and connect with interests; Instagram, a community for sharing photos, videos, and private messages, as well as feed, stories, reels, video, live, and shops; Messenger, a messaging application for people to connect with friends, family, communities, and businesses across platforms and devices through text, audio, and video calls; and WhatsApp, a messaging application that is used by people and businesses to communicate and transact privately. The Reality Labs segment provides augmented and virtual reality related products comprising consumer hardware, software, and content that help people feel connected, anytime, and anywhere. The company was formerly known as Facebook, Inc. and changed its name to Meta Platforms, Inc. in October 2021. Meta Platforms, Inc. was incorporated in 2004 and is headquartered in Menlo Park, California.
SectorCommunication Services
IndustryInternet Content & Information
CEOMark Elliot Zuckerberg
HeadquartersMenlo Park,CA,US
Official Websitehttp://www.meta.com
Employees (FY)78.86K
Average Revenue (1Y)$2.54M
Net Income per Employee$766.60K

Learn More about Meta Platforms (META)

Gate Learn Articles

Understanding the Meta-game.

Meta-game is a complex and esoteric concept in the field of encryption, involving game theory and behavioral economics. It includes underlying mechanisms, behavioral changes, best response functions, and reflex loops. Metagames inspire narratives through catalysts, influence price movements, and form reflexive loops through behavioral changes among market participants. Metagames can be self-enhancing or self-defeating, affecting their duration and trading strategies. The article uses examples such as the ETH killer trade, Facebook’s rebranding to Meta, and BTC ETF flows to demonstrate how the metagame works and how investors can identify and exploit these games to gain value.

2024-05-27

What are Meta Transactions (ERC-2771)? (2025)

What are Meta Transactions (ERC-2771)? (2025) Learn about this standard and meta transactions. Explore its benefits, mechanics, and 2025 latest developments including expanded real-world applications in gaming and NFT platforms, Biconomy's multi-chain relayer advancements, improved ecosystem integration, and enhanced security frameworks driving mainstream blockchain adoption through gasless interactions.

2025-06-17

Pendle - Beyond the Point Meta

"Point Meta" refers to a system that distributes points through a protocol. Pendle’s YT function essentially allows users to "leverage to purchase points," attracting significant capital to the platform. However, Boros has introduced a series of additional features, creating a flywheel effect and achieving product-market fit.

2024-12-11

Meta Platforms (META) FAQ

What's the stock price of Meta Platforms (META) today?

x
Meta Platforms (META) is currently trading at $613.00, with a 24h change of +0.54%. The 52-week trading range is $520.00–$796.25.

What are the 52-week high and low prices for Meta Platforms (META)?

x

What is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of Meta Platforms (META)? What does it indicate?

x

What is the market cap of Meta Platforms (META)?

x

What is the most recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) for Meta Platforms (META)?

x

Should you buy or sell Meta Platforms (META) now?

x

What factors can affect the stock price of Meta Platforms (META)?

x

How to buy Meta Platforms (META) stock?

x

Risk Warning

The stock market involves a high level of risk and price volatility. The value of your investment may increase or decrease, and you may not recover the full amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Before making any investment decisions, you should carefully assess your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance, and conduct your own research. Where appropriate, consult an independent financial adviser.

Disclaimer

The content on this page is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Gate shall not be held liable for any loss or damage resulting from such financial decisions. Further, take note that Gate may not be able to provide full service in certain markets and jurisdictions, including but not limited to the United States of America, Canada, Iran, and Cuba. For more information on Restricted Locations, please refer to the User Agreement.

Meta Platforms (META) Latest News

2026-05-04 03:57

Jefferies Raises Alphabet Price Target to $445 on May 4, Cuts Meta and Microsoft Targets

Jefferies raised Alphabet's price target from $400 to $445 on May 4, while cutting Meta's target from $1,000 to $825 and Microsoft's from $675 to $575, according to BlockBeats.

2026-05-03 15:53

Meta-1 Coin Operator Robert Dunlap Sentenced to 23 Years for $20M Fraud on May 3

According to Forbes, on May 3, Robert Dunlap, operator of the Meta-1 Coin scheme, was sentenced to 23 years in prison for defrauding approximately 1,000 investors between 2018 and 2023, with total losses exceeding $20 million. The U.S. Department of Justice revealed that Dunlap falsely claimed Meta-1 Coin was backed by $44 billion in gold reserves and $1 billion in artworks by Picasso, Dali, and Van Gogh, while promising returns as high as 224,923%. He provided investors with forged audit documents and insurance materials. Investigations found the claimed assets did not exist; the Meta Exchange website used automated trading bots to create false profit illusions, and tokens were never actually issued on-chain. Investor funds were diverted to luxury purchases including Ferraris.

2026-04-30 12:27

Meta Plans to Raise $25 Billion Through Bond Offering on April 30

According to 金十数据, Meta Platforms plans to raise up to $25 billion through a bond offering, the company announced today (April 30).

2026-04-30 04:51

Ex-Meta Executive Raises Funds for AI Startup Flourish at $2.5B Valuation

According to Bloomberg, Thomas Reardon, former Meta executive who led work on Meta's Neural Band, is raising funds for Flourish, a new AI startup focused on low-power AI systems. Lux Capital and Google Ventures have agreed to be major investors, with backers already committing $500 million at a $2.5 billion valuation. The valuation could reach $3.5 billion as funding talks continue.

2026-04-29 18:00

Meta Launches USDC Stablecoin Payouts in Colombia and Philippines on Solana and Polygon

According to a Meta help page, the social media giant has begun rolling out stablecoin payouts for creators in Colombia and the Philippines. Creators can now opt to receive earnings in USDC on either the Solana or Polygon networks by connecting a compatible third-party wallet such as MetaMask or Phantom to their Facebook payout account. Stripe is handling crypto-specific tax reporting, though Meta is not offering an off-ramp, requiring creators who wish to convert to local currency to use third-party exchanges.

Hot Posts About Meta Platforms (META)

ChainNewsAbmedia

ChainNewsAbmedia

2 hours ago
US President Trump said in a post on Truth Social: “I made $45 billion for the United States in 8 months!” The image card attached to the post also read: “Trump’s Intel investment is now up $45 billion!” The image shows that Trump bought Intel at a price of about $20, while Intel’s share price has risen to about $97. In the center of the card, it even highlights “45B” in huge lettering to emphasize that this investment has generated a $45 billion paper gain. This post has drawn attention not only because Trump directly credited himself with the rise in Intel’s stock price, but also because Intel—once, for many years, a traditional semiconductor giant that the market briefly viewed as having “missed the AI wave”—is now returning to the market spotlight amid multiple factors, including a reassessment of the AI supply chain, a rebound in CPU demand, and tight supply of advanced packaging capacity. Rising agentic AI, with CPUs returning to the core of data centers In the past, the core narrative of generative AI was heavily concentrated on GPUs. Training and inferencing large language models rely on massive parallel computation, making NVIDIA the most prominent beneficiary in the AI era—and leading the market at one point to believe that the role of CPUs in AI infrastructure was becoming marginalized. But when AI applications move beyond simply generating text and images and further toward “agentic AI,” computing demand starts to change. Agent systems don’t just answer a question once; they need to break down tasks, call tools, read data, repeatedly reason, and execute multi-step workflows. Workloads like these involve heavy data movement, multi-task coordination, system scheduling, and sequential computation—precisely the area CPUs have long been good at. NVIDIA has also noted that the number of tokens generated during the operation of agentic AI systems grows exponentially, making “performance per watt” an important consideration for building data center hardware. As enterprises begin deploying AI agents that can run for long periods and continuously carry out tasks, data centers no longer just need more GPUs; they also need more high-performance CPUs to handle the coordination and execution workloads behind agent workflows. This is why CPUs are being repriced by the market again. Bank of America estimates that the CPU market size could grow from $27 billion in 2025 to $60 billion by 2030. Both AMD and Intel are facing tight supply, with some products seeing lead times as long as six months and price increases of more than 10%. Analysts point out that wafer capacity constraints are the main cause of this supply crisis, and overall supply and demand may not improve meaningfully until 2026. This is also the first layer of background for Intel’s stock rebound: AI is not just a GPU story. As AI infra shifts from model training to agentic deployment, CPU demand is being reopened. Advanced packaging becomes the second main storyline: Intel’s EMIB is being seen again The second storyline behind Intel’s comeback narrative is advanced packaging. EMIB, short for Embedded Multi-die Interconnect Bridge, is Intel’s embedded multi-die interconnect bridge technology. Unlike traditional 2.5D packaging that relies on large silicon interposers, EMIB connects multiple dies or chiplets through small silicon bridges embedded in the packaging substrate. Intel argues that this approach reduces the use of additional silicon area, improves yields, lowers power consumption and cost, and also makes it easier to integrate chips from different process nodes and different IP blocks within a single package. Analyst Jeff Pu says Intel’s EMIB yield has reached 90%, which is an important positive for Intel Foundry and helps explain why market confidence in Intel Foundry has recently improved. The report also mentions that Google’s next-generation TPU is rumored to adopt Intel’s advanced packaging, NVIDIA’s next-generation Feynman chips have also been linked in market chatter to EMIB technology, and Meta has been singled out as potentially using EMIB in a CPU program in the late part of 2028. This suggests Intel’s opportunity may not be to immediately and positively challenge TSMC at the leading-edge manufacturing node, but rather to regain a position starting from the advanced packaging link that the AI supply chain lacks the most. Citrini Research’s prior bullish core rationale for Intel is also advanced packaging. Citrini believes that the market has often simplified AI semiconductor competition into NVIDIA versus ASICs, TSMC versus Intel, or Blackwell versus TPU—but this framework ignores a deeper bottleneck: regardless of which AI chip ultimately wins, advanced packaging is still required first. Google TPU, Amazon Trainium, Meta MTIA, and even future custom chips OpenAI might develop—all inherently move toward architectures with multiple dies, multiple chiplets, and multiple HBM. These chips are not fully interchangeable with one another; instead, they jointly consume limited advanced packaging capacity. Therefore, Citrini argues that Intel’s opportunity is not to regain leadership in leading-edge processes in the short term, but to capture spillover AI packaging demand that emerges after TSMC’s CoWoS supply becomes oversubscribed, using EMIB and Foveros. In other words, front-end chip manufacturing may still be handled by TSMC or Samsung, but the final stage entering Intel’s advanced packaging process will allow Intel to regain a key position in the AI supply chain. 90% yield is a positive, but it’s still 8 percentage points away from a mass-production benchmark However, Intel’s advanced packaging comeback narrative is not without risk. Analyst Guo Ming-chi points out that Intel already has experience with stable EMIB production, so the verified yield for the EMIB-T technology in development reaching 90% is a “positive but reasonable” signal. But internally, Intel uses FCBGA as the comparative yield benchmark for EMIB production, and the industry’s current FCBGA production yield is around 98% or higher. This means that even though Intel EMIB-T has already crossed an important technical validation threshold, increasing from 90% further to 98% may be more difficult than going from concept to 90%. On the surface, 90% and 98% differ by only 8 percentage points, but for high-priced, large-area, multi-die packaging products like AI chips, the yield gap will directly translate into costs, lead times, and effective output. Especially since Google’s next-generation TPU Humufish still has some specifications not yet finalized, and the verified yield in technology validation is not the same as the final yield in mass production. Therefore, while Guo Ming-chi looks positively at Intel’s long-term advanced packaging development, he also reminds that Intel’s ability to overcome mass-production challenges still needs to be watched in the near and mid term. In other words, Intel’s comeback story is already being priced in by the market, but the real test is not whether it can make EMIB-T—it’s whether it can deliver stable mass production at the costs, yields, lead times, and scale demanded by AI customers. This article Trump brags about his investment in Intel (Intel) multiplying fourfold: “I helped the U.S. make $45 billion in 8 months” first appeared on Lianxin ABMedia.
0
0
0
0